A new study shows that the environmental impact of beef is 10 times that of chicken and pork. In the United States research team led by Gudrun Essall, professor of environmental science at Bard College, the land nutrients were estimated to improve different types of products.
EVA Puzzle Mat is always a classic and
necessary educational toys for baby or children.
Made from Eco-friendly, closed cell,
non-smell and non-toxic EVA foam material, Melors promises that the foam puzzle mat
we offer is no harm to baby or children even many people is worry about the
safe of EVA foam product. We have passed ASTM and EN71 certificates for our EVA play mat, the certificates are available if customers need to have a look.
We have multiple educational puzzle mat designs like
numbers, letters, animals and vehicles for options, these are the basic and
common factors in the life, which is very good for the pre-school education for
baby and children, also as a safe and comfortable baby play mat applied in house.
If customer is interested in customized
design of the baby puzzle mat, please also feel free to let us know, we are capable to
produce the puzzle mat based on customized design, even the puzzle mat with a
full printing.
Eva Puzzle Mat,Baby Puzzle Mat,Eva Kids Puzzle Mat,Puzzle Floor Mat,Eva Jigsaw Mat,Educational Puzzle Mat Huizhou City Melors Plastic Products Co., Limited , https://www.melorsmarine.com
The results of the study indicate that beef production requires more than 28 times more land and 11 times more irrigation water than pork or chicken. At the same time, greenhouse gases are emitted five times as much. Although it is known that beef production has a considerable impact on the environment, this quantitative analysis can have a clearer understanding. Lamb and fish consumption in the United States is relatively low and studies have not been conducted. The huge environmental impact of beef is because cattle are far less efficient in converting food than pigs and chickens. “A very small portion of the food consumed by cattle enters the bloodstream, and most of the energy is lost,†Eshar said, and if food is used instead of grass feeding cows, this will make the efficiency even worse.
Although research does not mean that you must give up your favorite steak, it does provide an effective way to reduce carbon emissions as long as you eat less. “The biggest human intervention is not to give up cars, but to reduce beef consumption,†said Tim Benton of the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. The Australian Department of Health recommends daily intake of 65 grams of cooked beef, that is, 90 to 100 grams of raw meat. Reducing your intake will not only thank you for the environment, it will also significantly reduce the risk of bowel and stomach-related cancers. 